What is the difference between an expert and a professional?
A professional does what is needed to be done.
An expert explains - why.
How do people become professionals?
By accumulating professional experience.
How do people become experts?
By reflecting on accumulated professional experience.
The mission (i.e. the reason for existence) of science as a human practice is making reliable
predictions.
The mission of a scientist as an agent of that
practice is discovering truth and presenting it in a testable
form.
The mission of a teacher is fostering in students his/her love for learning.
The mission of a science teacher is sharing with students the feeling of pleasure from thinking.
The mission of a teacher is fostering in students his/her love for learning.
The mission of a science teacher is sharing with students the feeling of pleasure from thinking.
Two short video presentations:
I.
Links to publications on the various aspects of
the
methodology of teaching science (physics).
[scroll
down for the papers on
II.
general methodology of teaching
and
III. critique of philanthropic approaches to education]
II.
Links to publications on the general methodology of teaching.
Books:
Articles:
III. Critical reviews of philanthropic (and more)
approaches to education
6. When reforms are due, too much of experience may be as bad
as too little of it. (e.g. Bill Gates)
7.
Will the Yidan Prize Affect the Evolution of
Education? Too Soon to Say (probably not)
NB: www.Cognisity.How also includes posts on artificial intelligence
and political issues.
www.GoMars.xyz describes the services of
Education Advancement Professionals.
Appendix:
In my 2016 “Searching
For Visionaries” post I wrote:
“A visionary is not the one who can see things farther
away than others, nowadays everyone can utilize binoculars or other instruments
to see things afar. A visionary is the one who can see NOW, what others will
see much later.”
Since then I
wrote many more posts on education (evidently), but my search for a visionary
philanthropist has not yet been fruitful.
The critical
pieces in the third part of this webpage include descriptions of the efforts of
several foundations.
My critique
is not about what they do – I admire the efforts to help children getting
better education.
My critique
is about what they claim – they all claim to reform, reshape the whole
system of education.
I have
addressed that claim in my pieces.
Here I just
want to repeat again that all those foundations will prove is that if you
have enough money to hire enough good teachers and to provide to
teachers and student good learning environment, students will be
learning better than students in other schools.
Affecting
the whole system of education requires much more than that; and that is
the reason for me writing all those articles listed above (Don’t believe
me? Read them!).
Here and now
I will only repeat one major feature of the only approach which will
make a difference (if applied right) – the openness (some
specifics can be found in this
posts).
With best
wishes,
Appendix:
A copy of a
note from the
main page:
I am not an idiot or a reckless person. The reason I can
allow myself writing what I think, even if that is perpendicular to commonly
adopted and conventional views, is that my financial situation is sufficient
and stable. Of course, as a normal person, I wouldn't mind making more money,
or being involved in more interesting projects (as
described in my generic resume). But I do not have to pretend to be
someone I'm not to make my living.
Thanks, for sharing this informative post with us. You can also share more topics with students at student answering service. That is best platform for sharing information with students and teachers.
ReplyDelete